that all depends on HOW they do it.
i mean gravity is a pervasive force... do we NEGATE it... by somehow warping spacetime around us so that we are "hovering" in which case haven't we also removed ourselves from enertia as well...
which might have the unfortunate side effect of leaving us sitting still while the Earth spin rapidly beneath us while it shot away at a terrifying speed on its course around the sun...
OR do we reverse gravity (locally) like a repulsor magnet so that by adjusting the level of reversal we can elevate or descend at will...
and what about moving once we are free of gravity...
I think my personal ideal would be to somehow alter my own density (or is it MASS) so that I "weigh" 5 or 10 grams... or 5 or 10 lbs... thus allowing me to "fly" be flapping my outstretched palms, pushing against the air.
I want to swoop and dive and veer...
I read an article once about how during the crucial (and fleeting) instants right after a big bang, when energy is coalescing into matter... the pace of cooling actually is almost random... but that the point where spacetime cools to a certain point... the "resolution" of existence becomes static... meaning the distance that a proton orbits a nucleas becomes hard-coded into "physics"...
so in other (earlier/alternate) universes an atom may be 3 inches across. But the rules still apply...
IF we could bend/break spacetime and gain access to these alternate dimensions we wouldn't match the resolution...
we'd be too densley (or too sparsley) packed... our mass wouldn't match our displacement.
perhaps this explains strange matter... is it neuons that are paired particles at great distances... either way, are we simply inhabiting 1 level of a fractally defined super-verse, the next level up sees our solar systems as atoms...
what this has to do with antirgavity. I have no idea...
